Friday, March 21, 2014

Critical Thinking Post #2 :Does "Popular Science" Today Awe Us, Inspire Us or Threaten Us?

The first episode of the new Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey show, delves into the history of the planet earth, its beginnings, its recent discoveries, and a glimpse of its future from a scientific perspective. Although, it is a show based on scientific breakthroughs and theories, in my opinion the general “tone” pertaining humanistic values in terms of finding that our place in the universe is so small is surprisingly optimistic. Moreover, in my opinion it depends how you look at it, because to some it may give the impression that there is a notion of humanistic devaluation, nevertheless I perceived that the message that the show is trying to convey is that as humans we need to dig deeper into ourselves in order to understand our place in the cosmos and in that way obtain a realistic view of our species in comparison to our vast universe, in order to further our knowledge and expand our minds. As it was illustrated in the episode, throughout history various religious and political institutions have oppressed and persecuted people who dared to think outside the box such as Giordano Bruno, a man who had no tangible evidence that there was more to explore beyond our planet earth yet he was still inclined to defy traditional beliefs in search of the truth. As it was stated in the show, he was not a scientist or a scholar but he had the natural human drive and desire to want to learn more about the world he lived in, and was a able to form a theory which was later on proved to be correct. His martyrdom and commitment to his beliefs is an example of the human potential, hunger, and passion that is instinctual in humanity as well as a basis of humanism, which places an emphasis on human attributes and qualities. Therefore, I do not support the notion that the show is “antagonizing humanistic values”, but instead it is rather appreciating the merits of both, as well as trying to inspire the viewers to ascertain a realistic perspective of the world around us by employing our highly developed aptitude and skills.

Furthermore, I do not agree with Edward Rothstein’s view that “the insignificance of human existence is one of the fearsome lessons of modern science” (Rothstein, emphasis added), because science should not be depicted as an enemy but instead be used as a tool and a way to explore further into the significance of the existence of humanity since after all it is a field that strives to understand the origins of the human race but just from a different standpoint. After all, science is a discipline that strives to understand the world based on speculation, research, and evidence, therefore any scientific exhibition is going to reflect its perceptible and definite approach to any matter at hand, moreover it is up to the individual to absorb, interpret and use the scientific information acquired and implement it on a personal level, in order to further explore within one’s own self, rather than be judgmental, pessimistic and dismissive about it. Moreover, after watching this Cosmos episode, I was amazed by the universe’s extensive history as well as the series of momentous events that had to take place in order for the human race to thrive, what was even more intriguing was the way in which it was portrayed in accordance to our current yearly calendar. Furthermore, I was inspired to investigate as well as learn more about the local group and the Virgo super cluster two topics that were mentioned briefly discussed but I had never heard of before, and are worth learning about because not only are they full of wonder and beauty but also because the planet earth is part of this larger network of heavenly existence. 

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Blog #1: March 13-2014: Are You a Science or Humanities Person (or Both)?

My name is Sibyla, I am a current student in LaGuardia Community College; in the summer of 2014 I will be obtaining my Associate degree of Liberal Arts in Social Sciences and Humanities. As of now I have a list of both long and short term goals, which I will try my best to accomplish.
My main goal is to be part of the healthcare field, I am particularly interested in the field of radiology and I would like to become a Registered Radiologic Technologist with a specialization in nuclear medicine. In the fall of 2014, I plan to transfer to the New York City College of Technology, the Eugenio MarĂ­a de Hostos Community College or SUNY Downstate in order to start working towards my degree in Radiological Science. After receiving my Bachelor of Science, I plan to specialize in Nuclear Medicine; although I have also thought about becoming specialized in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (M.R.I) or Computed Tomography (C.T). Being Liberal Arts major has required me to take courses that have improved my communication and critical thinking skills. Even though, my major is not related to the allied health field, I am satisfied with the education that I have received thus far, because I feel like it has laid the educational groundwork that I need for the future.
As previously mentioned my ultimate career goal is not specifically related to my current major, consequently at the mention of this most people usually ask why did I not major in LA: Math and Science, but I am glad I was able to learn about subjects that include Philosophy, Anthropology, Psychology, Literature, and Foreign Languages, I feel like over all the Humanities has given me a broader view of life as well as a stronger educational backbone and has helped me to further improve and advance within my field of interest which is the natural Sciences.
In my opinion I feel like both concentrations are equally important and should be required as fields of study while studying any profession. I do not believe either Science or Humanism should be minimized when compared to one another, since both have been crucial to the history, the development and the general progression of human civilization; moreover both have the overall advancement of the human species as well as its origin as a chief priority. Humanism is a “philosophy based on a belief in the supreme importance of human beings and human values (www.oxfordreference.com), it is evident that it functions on rationality, logic, and thought just as Science does, although one cannot ignore some of the differences between the two. One main difference is that Science utilizes the scientific method in order to prove or dismantle any theories, as it is defined in the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, it is the “knowledge about or study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments and observation”(www.Merriamwebster.com). Furthermore, I consider myself to be both a Science and Humanities person, because I feel that both disciplines are essential areas of study in order to have renaissance mind, in addition I support the main idea behind Humanism which focuses in the importance of humanity and its values, likewise I also commend and appreciate facts, studies, discoveries and theories that have come about in the name of science. In terms of the advancement of technology itself, I consider it to be the result of the coming together of both fields of study, since critical thinking, human flair, science, art, and skill are all necessary abilities that must be employed together. However, technology as helpful and necessary as it may be especially in the 21st century, is a complex issue since unfortunately it may sometimes follow The Law of Unintended Consequences, because when one intervenes with technology sometimes we do not know what we are going to get, which can ultimately lead to “a perverse effect contrary to what was originally intended (when an intended solution makes a problem worse)” (www.wikipedia.com).

            Although in my opinion there is a downside to technology, I suppose most people in the United States feel positive about it, because we are a consumer nation, in addition to being bombarded by ads that advertise the latest gizmos and gadgets of this generation such as tablets, cell phones, and computers, that are made to sound simply indispensable to our current existence; all things considered we are currently living in a digital age which speaks for itself. In terms of the popular perspective on the issue of science as a way of understanding the world, I believe is something which is more or less based on personal values, education, background and religion rather than a general viewpoint; especially religious beliefs being a major determining factor because if there is a contender to the field of science other than what many people would believe it to be Humanism is Religion and its institutions.